New Harmonized Value-added Tax System Regulations, No. 2
Marginal note:Amounts and rates for participating provinces
44 In applying subsection 255(2) of the Act in respect of
(a) a residential complex situated in Ontario,
(i) the references in that subsection to “$472,500” are to be read as references to “$508,500”,
(ii) the references in that subsection to “$367,500” are to be read as references to “$395,500”,
(iii) the reference in that subsection to “$105,000” is to be read as a reference to “$113,000”,
(iv) the reference in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “the lesser of $6,300 and 1.60%”, and
(v) the reference in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (h) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “1.60%”;
(b) a residential complex situated in Nova Scotia,
(i) the references in that subsection to “$472,500” are to be read as references to “$517,500”,
(ii) the references in that subsection to “$367,500” are to be read as references to “$402,500”,
(iii) the reference in that subsection to “$105,000” is to be read as a reference to “$115,000”,
(iv) the reference in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “the lesser of $6,300 and 1.57%”, and
(v) the reference in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (h) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “1.57%”;
(c) a residential complex situated in New Brunswick,
(i) the references in that subsection to “$472,500” are to be read as references to “$517,500”,
(ii) the references in that subsection to “$367,500” are to be read as references to “$402,500”,
(iii) the reference in that subsection to “$105,000” is to be read as a reference to “$115,000”,
(iv) the reference in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “the lesser of $6,300 and 1.57%”, and
(v) the reference in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (h) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “1.57%”;
(d) [Repealed, SOR/2012-191, s. 37]
(d.1) a residential complex situated in Prince Edward Island,
(i) the references in that subsection to “$472,500” are to be read as references to “$517,500”,
(ii) the references in that subsection to “$367,500” are to be read as references to “$402,500”,
(iii) the reference in that subsection to “$105,000” is to be read as a reference to “$115,000”,
(iv) the reference in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “the lesser of $6,300 and 1.57%”, and
(v) the reference in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (h) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “1.57%”; and
(e) a residential complex situated in Newfoundland and Labrador,
(i) the references in that subsection to “$472,500” are to be read as references to “$517,500”,
(ii) the references in that subsection to “$367,500” are to be read as references to “$402,500”,
(iii) the reference in that subsection to “$105,000” is to be read as a reference to “$115,000”,
(iv) the reference in paragraph (g) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “the lesser of $6,300 and 1.57%”, and
(v) the reference in the description of A in the formula in paragraph (h) of that subsection to “1.71%” is to be read as a reference to “1.57%”.
- SOR/2012-191, s. 37
- SOR/2013-44, s. 34
- SOR/2016-119, s. 15
- SOR/2016-212, s. 14
- Date modified: